Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lordemannd"
(hey reverted your edits as not part of a stock standard Gramps) |
m |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Thanks for your edit, you need to know that the "theme" tab in preferences does not come with a default Gramps installation , it is something called an addon or plugin not sure you can see it [[Addon:Themes]]. The user manual should only reflect a stock standard Gramps without addons. [[User:GulliblePangolin|GulliblePangolin]] ([[User talk:GulliblePangolin|talk]]) 04:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC) | Thanks for your edit, you need to know that the "theme" tab in preferences does not come with a default Gramps installation , it is something called an addon or plugin not sure you can see it [[Addon:Themes]]. The user manual should only reflect a stock standard Gramps without addons. [[User:GulliblePangolin|GulliblePangolin]] ([[User talk:GulliblePangolin|talk]]) 04:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Sanitizing sample data== | ||
+ | I noted your enhancement suggestion {{bug|11601}} for sanitizing/anonymizing sample Trees submitted in association with a bug report. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It piqued my curiosity. So I did some searching. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It appears that there are several Python libraries to support redaction activities. | ||
+ | (Chloe McAteer's [https://towardsdatascience.com/revolutionising-redaction-my-final-year-project-fe664e28ef84 Revolutionising Redaction- My Final Year Project] posting was interesting reading.) However, the top [https://www.google.com/search?q=python+redaction&oq=python+redaction Search results] all seemed to target redacting PDFs rather than database samples. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Maybe we just need more sample Trees? | ||
+ | |||
+ | When I built a sample database for a student reporting system, I used cartoon characters... they proved more memorable when writing an example about reporting on interactions between multiple students. I could leverage the established comicstrip relationships: a bullying example report example with Popeye, Bluto, Olive Oyl, Sweet pea, & Poopdeck Pappy required far less explanation than one with generic names. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For charting & filter testing in Gramps however, the relationship were more complex than familiar cartoon families. So I built a Tree where the names were based on the Relationship to the Home Person and IDs were based on [[Genealogical_Numbering_Systems|Genealogical Numbering Systems]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Bamaustin|Bamaustin]] ([[User talk:Bamaustin|talk]]) 14:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:22, 25 June 2020
Welcome to Gramps! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Sam888 (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your edit, you need to know that the "theme" tab in preferences does not come with a default Gramps installation , it is something called an addon or plugin not sure you can see it Addon:Themes. The user manual should only reflect a stock standard Gramps without addons. GulliblePangolin (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Sanitizing sample data
I noted your enhancement suggestion 11601 for sanitizing/anonymizing sample Trees submitted in association with a bug report.
It piqued my curiosity. So I did some searching.
It appears that there are several Python libraries to support redaction activities. (Chloe McAteer's Revolutionising Redaction- My Final Year Project posting was interesting reading.) However, the top Search results all seemed to target redacting PDFs rather than database samples.
Maybe we just need more sample Trees?
When I built a sample database for a student reporting system, I used cartoon characters... they proved more memorable when writing an example about reporting on interactions between multiple students. I could leverage the established comicstrip relationships: a bullying example report example with Popeye, Bluto, Olive Oyl, Sweet pea, & Poopdeck Pappy required far less explanation than one with generic names.
For charting & filter testing in Gramps however, the relationship were more complex than familiar cartoon families. So I built a Tree where the names were based on the Relationship to the Home Person and IDs were based on Genealogical Numbering Systems.