Difference between revisions of "User:BACbKA"

From Gramps
Jump to: navigation, search
(dump out random thoughts that have piled up)
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* auto-translation of names, places, etc. - for reports and exports
 
* auto-translation of names, places, etc. - for reports and exports
 
* reports & export should have more in common -- in filtering/selecting source set and output data
 
* reports & export should have more in common -- in filtering/selecting source set and output data
 +
** new action - filter, expose for cli?
 +
** see also bug #{{bug|1600}} and [[Filtered_Reports]]
 
* what is the best practice for collaboration with other active researchers? Is there a tutorial? Should gramps collab with multisync @sf? or some DVCS? Obvious use cases:
 
* what is the best practice for collaboration with other active researchers? Is there a tutorial? Should gramps collab with multisync @sf? or some DVCS? Obvious use cases:
 
# two (or more) people using GRAMPS. Each wants to be the master of his own DB and vet anything incoming.
 
# two (or more) people using GRAMPS. Each wants to be the master of his own DB and vet anything incoming.
# make life easy for people taking periodic exports from gramps - can we send out only the stuff that changed? (yet another multisync sub-problem)
+
# make life easy for people taking periodic exports from gramps
 +
 
 +
This is a known hot issue, see [[How_you_can_help#Web_2.0]]
 +
- can we send out only the stuff that changed? (yet another multisync sub-problem)
 +
 
 +
[[Category:User|B]]

Revision as of 02:20, 20 October 2011

Vassilii Khachaturov

My GRAMPS-related scratchpad

  • merge familylines and relgraph good stuff into a common report
  • auto-translation of names, places, etc. - for reports and exports
  • reports & export should have more in common -- in filtering/selecting source set and output data
  • what is the best practice for collaboration with other active researchers? Is there a tutorial? Should gramps collab with multisync @sf? or some DVCS? Obvious use cases:
  1. two (or more) people using GRAMPS. Each wants to be the master of his own DB and vet anything incoming.
  2. make life easy for people taking periodic exports from gramps

This is a known hot issue, see How_you_can_help#Web_2.0 - can we send out only the stuff that changed? (yet another multisync sub-problem)