Difference between revisions of "Talk:Third-party Addons"

From Gramps
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: A lot of these plugins are part of the GRAMPS codebase. Do they really classify as "third-party"? --~~~~)
 
(Ordering)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A lot of these plugins are part of the GRAMPS codebase. Do they really classify as "third-party"? --[[User:Lcc|Lcc]] 18:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 
A lot of these plugins are part of the GRAMPS codebase. Do they really classify as "third-party"? --[[User:Lcc|Lcc]] 18:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Perhaps "3rd party" is not the best description, but none of these come with gramps (except for Check.py which is an update). They are all extensions of the installed base. Getting source from SVN does give you some, though. --[[User:Dsblank|Dsblank]] 20:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Ordering ==
 +
Would it be ok to sort these? I don't see any ordering yet. I'd like to sort them alphabetically at least. --[[User:Lcc|Lcc]] 02:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
They should be in some order. What about by type, then by name? I think that the Plugin Manager Gramplet doesn't care. Just keep the formatting! Thanks --[[User:Dsblank|Dsblank]] 02:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:43, 3 April 2009

A lot of these plugins are part of the GRAMPS codebase. Do they really classify as "third-party"? --Lcc 18:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps "3rd party" is not the best description, but none of these come with gramps (except for Check.py which is an update). They are all extensions of the installed base. Getting source from SVN does give you some, though. --Dsblank 20:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Ordering

Would it be ok to sort these? I don't see any ordering yet. I'd like to sort them alphabetically at least. --Lcc 02:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

They should be in some order. What about by type, then by name? I think that the Plugin Manager Gramplet doesn't care. Just keep the formatting! Thanks --Dsblank 02:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)