Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rollover for the manual"

From Gramps
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
https://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Stub_Stagnant&action=edit
 
https://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Stub_Stagnant&action=edit
 
[[User:Bamaustin|Bamaustin]]  
 
[[User:Bamaustin|Bamaustin]]  
 +
 
([[User talk:Bamaustin|talk]]) 14:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 
([[User talk:Bamaustin|talk]]) 14:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:54, 25 June 2021

Does it makes sense to add a step to check the pages that link to the bug template? If it is determined the bug was on the Roadmap for the new release, the section may need updating.

https://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Documented_Bugs Bamaustin (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


No we should not record bugs in the user manual at all. The ones that are recorded are generally on the support pages for third-party addons and special pages like the GEPS (Gramps Enhancement Proposals) etc. I've added a section here for Rollover_for_the_manual#Version_manual_template Sam888 (talk)

Could the Stub templates (including language variants) on rollover pages be converted to something like a Stub_Stagnant template? Once pages are locked for editing, these pages just add noise to the Stub management.

Template created & available for renaming. https://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Stub_Stagnant&action=edit Bamaustin

(talk) 14:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)