I've been working a bit recently on the gramps wiki in this section (portal) about genealogy. Then I thought "why do we have our own gramps section about genealogy instead of contributing to a common resource.?"
So I found these wikis which are not associated with any specific software, which I think is good. What do you think about these? And please add more options for adding content. --DuncanNZ 14:51, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
|Website||License||Positive points||Negative points||Redistributable with documentation?|
|Familypedia||GFDL||Claim 24,320 entries||Opinion and actual genealogy share the same wiki||?|
|WeRelate.org||GFDL (text)||Claim 2,000,000 entries. By the registered charity Foundation for On-Line Genealogy||Opinion and actual genealogy share the same wiki||?|
|FamilySearch Wiki-Beta Test||BY-NC-SA||FamilySearch Wiki is [only] about genealogical research advice.(ref)||BY-NC-SA requires citation, tricky if you're merging many sources.||?|
|GenealogyWiki.org||A Creative Commons license, but the license link is dead. I've written to him.||Is only for genealogy information, not articles and thoughts.||Is only for genealogy information, not articles and thoughts.||?|
|GeneaWiki||BY-NC-SA||+ in french, very active||- only in french||?|
- The pages you linked there are GRAMPS specific. I don't think they should move, just the generic pages, or pages which with some rewording can be generic. --DuncanNZ 07:47, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Uncertain if this is where to post my question, but - would someone advise me on how to include a page within a GRAMPS book that contains the Gallery items? Alos, how to include gallery items in a report?
I have not been able to find this in the documentation.
- Please join the [gramps-users] email list and ask there. That's the best place to get help. --DuncanNZ 14:29, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
Great idea, why duplicate effort.
BUT what about making it a practice to add documentation of reference notes to the bottom of a section. Wikipedia does this, but only at the bottom. I think it makes more sense to make it closest to the subject. On my personal wiki, where I keep configuration notes, I have made a practice of this.
- I tend to do that too. But it depends on how much information you want to have in the reference. A full reference with name, date, website, author takes too much space. --DuncanNZ 07:45, 26 July 2008 (EDT)