Difference between revisions of "Talk:Portal:Genealogy"
(→Proposed move) |
(→Proposed move) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | - | ||
+ | | [http://www.geneawiki.com GeneaWiki] | ||
+ | | [http://www.geneawiki.com/index.php/GeneaWiki:Copyright BY-NC-SA] | ||
+ | | + in french, very active | ||
+ | | - in french ... | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
Revision as of 07:51, 2 August 2008
Proposed move
I've been working a bit recently on the gramps wiki in this section (portal) about genealogy. Then I thought "why do we have our own gramps section about genealogy instead of contributing to a common resource.?"
So I found these wikis which are not associated with any specific software, which I think is good. What do you think about these? And please add more options for adding content. --DuncanNZ 14:51, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
-Website | License | Positive points | Negative points |
---|---|---|---|
Familypedia, the Genealogy wiki | GFDL | + | - |
WeRelate.org | GFDL | + | - |
FamilySearch Wiki-Beta Test | BY-NC-SA | + | - |
GenealogyWiki.org | Unknown licenses | + | - |
GeneaWiki | BY-NC-SA | + in french, very active | - in french ... |
- What about translations ?
- What about internal links ?
- ex : Events in Gramps or GRAMPS' Glossary
- The pages you linked there are GRAMPS specific. I don't think they should move, just the generic pages, or pages which with some rewording can be generic. --DuncanNZ 07:47, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Bob
Uncertain if this is where to post my question, but - would someone advise me on how to include a page within a GRAMPS book that contains the Gallery items? Alos, how to include gallery items in a report?
I have not been able to find this in the documentation.
Bob
- Please join the [gramps-users] email list and ask there. That's the best place to get help. --DuncanNZ 14:29, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
Jerry
Great idea, why duplicate effort.
BUT what about making it a practice to add documentation of reference notes to the bottom of a section. Wikipedia does this, but only at the bottom. I think it makes more sense to make it closest to the subject. On my personal wiki, where I keep configuration notes, I have made a practice of this.
Example:
Reference:
X Over SSH2 - A Tutorial Jerry Perkins' Genealogy
- I tend to do that too. But it depends on how much information you want to have in the reference. A full reference with name, date, website, author takes too much space. --DuncanNZ 07:45, 26 July 2008 (EDT)