Difference between revisions of "Developer policies"

From Gramps
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add reference to source File Headers)
(cleanup)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
=== Coding style ===
 
=== Coding style ===
GRAMPS follows PEP 8. More info and general policy: [[Programming Guidelines]]. Starting from 3.2 minimal pylint scores will probably be enforced.
+
Follow the Gramps [[Programming Guidelines]] - which mostly refer to PEP8 with a few additions.
  
Concerning the visual elements, a general UI style is agreed upon: [[UI Style]]
+
All source files shall include conforming [[Source File Headers]].
  
All source files shall include conforming [[Source File Headers]].
+
=== GUI design ===
 +
User interfaces shall conform to the agreed upon: [[UI Style]]
  
 
=== Acceptable changes ===
 
=== Acceptable changes ===

Revision as of 04:02, 13 December 2009

This document collects the different policies the GRAMPS developer community has adopted.

Coding Policies

Licence

GRAMPS is a GPLv2 application with possibility to use a later version of the GPL (GPLv3). There are no plans at the moment to move to GPLv3 and drop GPLv2. See Project License for details.

Coding style

Follow the Gramps Programming Guidelines - which mostly refer to PEP8 with a few additions.

All source files shall include conforming Source File Headers.

GUI design

User interfaces shall conform to the agreed upon: UI Style

Acceptable changes

You should follow the roadmap set out for the next release. Only minor features or new reports/gramplets/... can still be added to the roadmap after it has been made official. Add your changes to the roadmap (on this wiki and in the bug tracker) so others are notified what you work on. Seek approval for your changes via the devel mailing list.

Commit Policies

General

Read Committing Policies

Becoming an official developer

The road to become an official developer is as follows:

  • Fix bug issues on the bug tracker and participate in the devel mailing list.
  • Accept the guidance from existing developers. If you do not agree with them, you need to convince them. To do that consider first to code what is asked pointing out the weakness afterward, i.e let the code speak for you.
  • Take up a feature request after assuring yourself (eg via the devel mailing list) the feature will probably be accepted by the developers. Let your code be reviewed.
  • Once you come to the conclusion your code needs little change before commit, ask one of the admins (Benny, Brian) to add your sourceforge id to the list of developers. If you did not have contact with the admins yet, ask one of the other developers to vouch for you.
  • Even after you obtained commit rights, consider a review of your code by other developers using the bug tracker (send reminder) or the devel mailing list.